The article and the reading both discusses about the suppression of forest fire and it's effect on the forest. The reading claims that decrease in the destruction of forest by fire is important to promote healthy and long life of the forest. The lecture challenges the claim that the fire suppression has its long term effects on the forest.
To begin with, the author argues that fire suppression increases the longer lives and the maturation of trees. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture that the maturation of trees leads to a dense forest where there will be the lack of light for the young trees. Also, young trees would not mature enough to replace their old ones.
Secondly, the reading posits that forest fire burning decreases the nutrients in the soil. Moreover, the author says, it is good for the ground level bushes and vines to flourish and grow. The lecture, however, rebuts this by mentioning that recent study has proved that there is tremendous amount of nutrients found in the soil after the forest fire which is released from the burned trees.
Finally, the reading claims that as a result of suppression of forest fire - there is an increase in the number of deer population. In contrast, the lecture's opinion is that this also leads to the destruction of the young oak tress. She elaborated this by bringing up the point that the deer population feeds on the leaves of young plants which finally gets killed despite lack of light or the dense forest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article and the reading both discuss...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...te healthy and long life of the forest. The lecture challenges the claim that the f...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its long term effects on the forest. To begin with, the author argues that fi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure enough to replace their old ones. Secondly, the reading posits that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ioning that recent study has proved that there is tremendous amount of nutrients ...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is released from the burned trees. Finally, the reading claims that as a re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lectures'' or 'lecture's'?
Suggestion: lectures'; lecture's
...er of deer population. In contrast, the lectures opinion is that this also leads to the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n contrast, the lectures opinion is that this also leads to the destruction of th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82879377432 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39153568699 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501945525292 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5598596317 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.416666667 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317548981132 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137666083814 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113278553088 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197896919911 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102461113752 0.0443174109184 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.