The reading passage claims several different theories about how the agnostids may have lived. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
The reading passage claims several different theories about how the agnostids may have lived. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article that the agnostids may been free-swimming predators. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that this theory is not so logical because most of the agnostids had tiny eyes with poor vision and these kinds of eyes are not so efficient for free-swimming predators. Also, there is not enough evidence for other features that helped them during hunting.
Second, the reading passage claims that the agnostids may dwelled on the seafloor. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justifies the information presented in the reading and makes the point that the Seafloor Dwellers are not so fast and there are occupied just in small areas. But, the agnostids were so fast and evidence shows they spread in large distances pretty fast.
Third, the article puts forward the idea that there is the possibility that the agnostids were parasites. In the same way, the speaker validates the idea and adds that parasites mostly are in small size and live in large population but the agnostids were so big and their group was smaller than parasites.
To sum up, both the writer and speaker hold conflicting views about how the agnostids may have lived.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
The reading passage claims several different theories about how the agnostids may ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'may be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: may be; has been
...sidering the article that the agnostids may been free-swimming predators. In contrast, t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, in contrast, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11739130435 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54750331833 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526086956522 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9687861292 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414422234235 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165195009637 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173044385114 0.0662205650399 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260675149377 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.260468164834 0.0443174109184 588% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.