The reading passage states that humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding or mating purposes and they have ability to navigate by stars. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
The reading passage states that humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding or mating purposes and they have ability to navigate by stars. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article the humpback whales have high degree of cognitive ability with a complex brain. This suggests that whales can use night sky stars for orientation in proper ways. In contrast, the professor contradicts the idea and says that actually intelligence has no related to the navigation ability and some birds such as ducks can find their way without high intelligence.
Second, the reading passage claims that animals can maintain movement in the right direction with external sign and force. So whales can not rely on land features and they rely on stars at night. Admittedly, the professor validates the information presented in the reading and makes the point that according to new research whales and most of animals rely on Earth's magnetic field with their bio-magnet in their body not any external clues.
Third, the writer puts forward the idea that sop-hopping is a function by whales for looking at stars. In the same way, the speaker justifies the idea and adds that some animals such as sharks doing this function and they never migrate. Also, whales do spy-hopping during the days too.
To sum up, both the speaker and writer hold conflicting views about whales' navigation by stars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the animals') or simply say ''most animals''.
Suggestion: most of the animals; most animals
...at according to new research whales and most of animals rely on Earths magnetic field with thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, in contrast, such as, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10416666667 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48394497501 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0462979125 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403817674968 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14042236466 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173833515575 0.0662205650399 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245079973598 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.284655477476 0.0443174109184 642% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.