The recent study reveals that people, especially young people, are reading far less literature. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects........
The reading section and the writing are talking about the issue regarding the decline in the number of literature readers. The author presents three effects of decreasing literature readers. However, the lecturer opposes this idea. He is of the opinion that the given explanations are faulty. The disagreements between the author and the lecturer are discussed below.
First of all, the author presents that the public is missing important ideas by not reading the literature. He further says that literature is the best way to enhance our thinking ability. However, the lecturer counters this saying. He says that people nowadays are into science and history-related books. These books are as good as literature. Furthermore, these trending books help people to get knowledge and increase their intellectual ability.
Secondly, the author has related not reading literature with a decline in the cultural quality. He says that reading trivial papers on the web and watching entertainment has hampered the culture of the people. Nevertheless, the lecturer has opposed this idea. He says that people are watching high-quality music and movies which help people to learn about their cultures. He insists that people are not wasting time by watching and reading means of entertainment, rather they are learning from these tools.
Thirdly, the reading section argues that due to the lack of the audiences, authors of the novels are demotivated to publish more novels product. Moreover, the poor standard of the readers has caused the decline of the literature. The lecturer, however, says that the fault is of writers due to the lack of vivid contents. The novels and other literature products are so obscure that it has become difficult for the people to understand. So, the number of literature readers has decreased.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends.Use specific examples and reasons to support your answers.61
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve66
- GroupthinkWhen private institutions or government agencies need to solve problems or develop new processes they assemble groups of people to work on the task. The advantages of teams composed of many individuals over individuals working alone are several.66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.58
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'novels'' or 'novel's'?
Suggestion: novels'; novel's
... novels are demotivated to publish more novels product. Moreover, the poor standard of...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, talking about, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32413793103 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77465383857 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486206896552 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0212420821 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5238095238 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8095238095 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.096277493404 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307111072212 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321740742183 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577939320325 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243737659991 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.