Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.

There has always been debate over the role of the government whether funding by government act positively. Some argue that funding of the art is necessary for the flourishing and to make art available to all the people while some people argue on the other way suggesting that funding by government threatens the integrity of art. In my opinion, funding is necessary for the promotion and maintenance of art treatise until the art is not intended to promote the biased issues and propaganda by the government. So, I mostly agree with the given prompt and would like to present my views as follows.

Firstly, most of the pristine form of art is getting away from our grip as people and government are nowadays indifferent to it. However, the role of the government should be to promote the art and culture of the nation. Government should focus on the preservation of the art galleries and museums to enhance the availability of arts to all the people. The protection and preservation of art help for the new generation to be influenced by it's essence. For instance, "Mithila art'' is one of the traditional art of Janakpur, one of the city located in Nepal, which is hardly access for the new generation at Janakpur. Government of Nepal should activate the art preservation campaign in this area to make this specific art accessible to the next generation.

Secondly, it is necessary to allocate the budget in the field of art to encourage contemporary and old generations who are interested but are not taking it due to monetary issue. Proper allocation of money and enhancing the existing form of art will attract the beginners to invest their maximum time in the creation of new art. For instance, Leonardo da Vinci was also funded to design the frame of Monolisa, one of the most prominent art piece in the history. Furthermore, Picasso was also funded by the government of Spain to make art to influence the people for the betterment of the society. Hence, funding does not necessarily threatens the art.

However, sometime it is possible that government funding can hamper the integrity of the art. For instance, when the art is used for spreading the inappropriate propaganda related to politics, it will surely make the art as the issue of conflict. Surely, art is not meant to disguise the negative aspect of political activities rather it must aim to elucidate the deformities which are prevalent in the societies.
So, government should be careful in the use of art and always try to make proper use of it.

In conclusion, funding for art itself is not deleterious until the mishaps are not cultivated in the name of art. Government must play the role of ''head'' for the proper functioning and preservation of art society so that the next generation can relish on the unspoiled form of art.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and museums to enhance the availability of arts to all the people. The protectio...
^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ila art is one of the traditional art of Janakpur, one of the city located in Nep...
^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'accessed'.
Suggestion: accessed
... city located in Nepal, which is hardly access for the new generation at Janakpur. Gov...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'threaten'
Suggestion: threaten
...ty. Hence, funding does not necessarily threatens the art. However, sometime it is pos...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...meant to disguise the negative aspect of political activities rather it must aim ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2335.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85446985447 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85446001213 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440748440748 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9680373705 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.19047619 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9047619048 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519249929192 0.243740707755 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192158054974 0.0831039109588 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118235575385 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305198835415 0.150359130593 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978233121889 0.0667264976115 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.