The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Leaders are the characters of the nation or any particular society that led the revolutionary movement or approach the most pressing scenario prevailing in the society. Working as main man and motivating all the people of the society to unite for the cause, leaders try to work on the dire situation of the hoi polloi. The given prompt claims the well-being of the society as the indicator of effectiveness of the leaders. In my opinion, the presented case may not always be true. So, I mostly disagree with the given prompt and suggest that leaders work for enhancing the situation of the people but does not necessarily guarantee the well beings. The below presented analysis will help to shed light on my thesis.
Firstly, leaders are there in the society and they first raise voice against the different discrimination that are deep-rooted such as cast system, religion, slavery etcetera. The main aim that leaders carry is to free the people from any kind of domination and restriction. For instance, Mahatma Gandhi, a pioneering person to carry out a different form of movement -nonviolence movement in India, lead the people to rail against the domineering British colony. After much effort to uproot the British effect in India, the movement became successful and eventually the people of India became free from the British peremptory. However, problems related to poverty, education and health are still epidemic in India. The given example illustrates that effective leadership does not always enhance the well beings of the citizens.
Secondly, measuring the effectiveness of the leader through the well-being of the country's citizen is no way a better approach as uplifting the low strata of the entire group of citizens in the single tenure of leader is daunting and almost impossible task. Those components that are hindering the well-being of the people such as low education quality and health services, low income etcetera are firmly established in the society .For example, Bill Clinton in his single tenure of presidency was able to uplift the economic level. His contribution in the American society is still revered by most of the people and Clinton is accepted as one of the prominent leader. Nevertheless, his contribution was not that much enough to raise the level of all citizens. This example shows that encompassing all the citizens is difficult and also the contribution given by the leader cannot be neglected.
However, leaders of the nations in their own field of specializations must think about how the well-being of the people can be augmented. For instance, political leaders are the people from whom the common people most expect. People give their important vote to the most deserving candidate so that the chosen leader would help to fulfill their basic needs. Moreover, people consider political leader as reliable and effective if the leader is solicitous about the exigent situation of the people and country.
In conclusion, mostly the contribution of the leader is measured in terms of how the people have enhanced their way of living by fulfilling basic needs. However, the impact of leaders always cannot be measured in terms of well-being. Sometimes the effect of the work done by the leader may be on small scale and sometimes work may be concerned on eradicating negative elements from the society which does not necessarily enhance the well-being and such contributions cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will help to shed light on my thesis. Firstly, leaders are there in the societ...
^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce, Mahatma Gandhi, a pioneering person to carry out a different form of movemen...
^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dia, lead the people to rail against the domineering British colony. After much e...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hance the well beings of the citizens. Secondly, measuring the effectiveness of...
^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ra are firmly established in the society .For example, Bill Clinton in his single ...
^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... are firmly established in the society .For example, Bill Clinton in his single ten...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ven by the leader cannot be neglected. However, leaders of the nations in their...
^^^
Line 10, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncerned on eradicating negative elements from the society which does not necessar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2896.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 561.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16221033868 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79626481479 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450980392157 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 904.5 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0622832234 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159345453816 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051426938334 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045287842864 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970186528689 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334233094148 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.