Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and

Essay topics:

Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Government plays the key role in the uplifting of the artistic programs, and to preserve the environment. In my opinion, funding budget in the preservation of the environment is more critical as compared to the artistic sectors. I feel this way, which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, environmental quality is getting worse than ever, and it has become the most pressing subject for all living beings. The problems such as global warming and Antarctic ice melting have given the sign of red flag to the people. Still, people are disinterested about the effects of environmental degradation; they are still busy on deforestation for the extension of habitat. The scenario in the most part of the world is the vivid example of this. In my country India also, the temperature is increasing year after year. As a result, animals which prefer cold climate are getting extinct. Not only this, according to the data of forestry department, the area occupied by the forest decreased by 15 percent in the past five years. So there is urgency to carry out environmental protection strategy, if not, living being will lose their existence.

Secondly, natural aesthetic is the key to the development of the tourism. Furthermore, natural environment provides shelter to the different types of flora and fauna which are the critical factors for the attraction of the people. The example of greenery in my country India illustrates this concept. Once there were no such forest areas in my country. As a result, there was no shelter for the endangered plants and animals. Taking care of this scenario, our government started to preserve the existing forest areas and promoted the area by tree plantation. Now, different national parks and conservation areas have established and they are giving shelter to Bengal tiger, one of the most renowned endangered animal, and other animals too. Due to the greenery environment and the existence of precious plants and animals, many national and international tourists visit here. If my country was like desert, no one would have visited here.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the government should invest more wealth in the preservation of the environment as compared to other issues. This is because preservation of the environment helps to make us safe from environmental problems such as global warming, and the greenery environment is the key for the tourism development.

Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2019-10-06 harshalg007 90 Read full essay
2019-08-31 nazp 73 Read full essay
2019-08-30 Newphobos 83 Read full essay
2019-08-07 Malaak 83 Read full essay
2019-06-30 alta 83 Read full essay
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence. India illustrates this concept. Once there were no such forest areas in my c...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13784461153 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91100356348 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5995358847 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1363636364 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95454545455 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112135104379 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322003938594 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393841094298 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804303204236 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342093873609 0.0645574589148 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.