Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Government funding should be spent only after much thought and deliberation. In my opinion, the government should provide the extra money for funding programs which can help in enhancing the environment. This is mainly because of two reasons which I will elaborate on this essay.
To begin with, environment affects all the people of a country. The deterioration of environment will have a negative impact on the health and standard of living of the general people of the country. For the people of a country to prosper, it is crucial to maintain and improve the surroundings. Good environment will lead to better health and also improve work efficiency of the people which can contribute to general growth of the nation. For instance, the air pollution in Delhi
lead to shutting down of various institutions and cause lot of health problems for general public. The government, then, decided to put more funds towards environment-friendly subway and also planting of trees. As a result of this, the air pollution has decreased over the years and also, the occurrence of lungs disease has decreased. Consequently, there was no shutting down of institutions and there was no loss of work due to poor condition of the air.
Secondly, environment not only affects the people of the nation but also affects the flora and fauna of the country. It is the responsibility of a government to not only look after the people of the nation but also provide a safe environment for the plants and animals of the country. changing of climate, deforestation and increasing
of global temperature has affected many plants and animals and in some cases, leading to extinction of the plants and animals. For example, the number of Royal Bengal tigers has showed a major decline due to deforestation of Sunderbans. But this reducing number was reversed by providing more funds towards forestation and maintaining the areas of Sunderbans. The number of Royal Bengal tigers has slowly increased over the last few years. This shows that government fund can restore the condition of lot of species living in the nation.
In conclusion, government should contribute financially for the enhancement of environment. This is because enhancement of environment is necessary for the well-being of the general public and also, for the maintenance of the flora and fauna of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lead
... instance, the air pollution in Delhi lead to shutting down of various institution...
^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ns and cause lot of health problems for general public. The government, then, decided to put m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Changing
... the plants and animals of the country. changing of climate, deforestation and increasin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
...climate, deforestation and increasing of global temperature has affected many pl...
^^
Line 17, column 175, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... is necessary for the well-being of the general public and also, for the maintenance of the fl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.0752688172 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13436692506 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02016229016 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441860465116 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4501192367 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.35 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183970369874 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632058571764 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718133843923 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106265396638 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079108651883 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.