In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, frogs help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. Several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog populations.
First, frogs are being harmed by pesticides, which are chemicals used to prevent insects from damaging farm crops such as corn and sugarcane. Pesticides often spread from farmland into neighboring frog habitats. Once pesticides enter a frog’s body, they attack the nervous system, leading to severe breathing problems. If laws prohibited the farmers from using harmful pesticides near sensitive frog populations, it would significantly reduce the harm pesticides cause to frogs.
A second major factor in frog population decline is a fungus that has spread around the world with deadly effect. The fungus causes thickening of the skin, and since frogs use their skin to absorb water, infected frogs die of dehydration. Recently, researchers have discovered several ways to treat or prevent infection, including antifungal medication and treatments that kill the fungus with heat. Those treatments, if applied on a large scale, would protect sensitive frog populations from infection.
The reading states that there are three methods according to addressing a problem caused by declinig in frog's population. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that approving some strict laws which prevent farmers from using pesticides can be good approach in order to save frog's population. Because these pesticides cause somee breathing problems for frogs which is death-leading. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that this methos is not economicaly practical, due to its disadvantage on farmers whose lands are near frogs' habitats. They will face lower yield by not using pesticides and they could not stay in market as well as other farmers in others lans.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that presence of fungus all around the world is can be considred as another reason for frogs' declining population. This fungus makes the frogs' skin thick so they cannot absorb water in order to survive, as a result this fungus can be ceased by using antifungal medications. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that applying of antifungal medication is not a useful approach, because it brings about two diffulties. The first one is that all frogs should be treated individualy, as their population is in a large scale it cannot be reliable. Another problems caused by this treatmet is that the infection will not be prevented from passaing to the next generation of frogs, so this treatment should be applied for each generation wich is very complicated and expensive.
Finally, the reading asserts that protecting wetlands from drying can be a good solution to help frogs continue their breeding. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact using large amount of water and also depleting etlans and lakes by humans' activities is not the main reason. The real reason of this decrease is the global warming that cannot be controled by prohibiting people from using these wetlands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-11 | sanddy | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | dxy40747 | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | zuhn | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 71 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 80
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospheric pre 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...asons proposed by the reading passage. The author argues that approving some stric...
^^^
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y, the lecturer brings up the idea that this methos is not economicaly practical, du...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in contrast, as a result, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10542168675 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68780538611 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539156626506 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2880056077 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.071428571 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133618971884 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523103957187 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513691147671 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757682550201 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333013687912 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.