Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, we are in a situation where the world is changing and becoming more sophisticated. As a result of this progression there will be a significant number of changes in each system and service, and car are not the exception of this fact. The controversial question which arises here is whether, there will be fewer cars in use for twenty years than are there today or not. When it comes to me, it is my fiem conviction that, as time goes, the number of cars will decrease. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason which comes to my mind is that, thanks to the improvemet of science and technology, there are more possible alternatives for people to stay in their home and get their tasks done instead of going to a certain place; as a result, the number of cars in use for this kind of activities are fewer than in past. The technology is on an exponential speed; so, as the same of its result in contemporary era, there will be more advanced opportunity for people in future which prevent them from using cars to go to some places that results in the deline of the cars number. For example, years ago, we had to go to bank to do our transactions, but todays, due to the advanced breakthrough of technology we can do our banking transactions in our home just by using smart phones, so we are not in desperate need of using cars as we were in the past.
Another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that, the environmet is experiencing a raise in the amout of pollution in air. One of the biggest source of air pollution is the large number of cars present in streets. Air pollution may bring about physical heath problem for people, as a result their need for medical services will increase; which end up costing the government a lot of money to provide this situation for people. It goes without saying that, the more prudent course of action that shoud be considered by the government is to approve laws and prevent people using private cars. In this regard, not only will the number of cars in use decrease, but also all people will enjoy cleaner air and will have healthier life.Due to the concern of the government and the rising rate of air pollution in this days, the number of will be decreased in future.
In short, all the aformentioned reasons lead us to the fact that there will be fewer cars in use in twenty years later. The fact that the advancement of technology will reduce people's need use cars, coupled with adjusting some strict laws, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... this kind of activities are fewer than in past. The technology is on an exponential sp...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 748, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Due
...leaner air and will have healthier life.Due to the concern of the government and th...
^^^
Line 3, column 825, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...and the rising rate of air pollution in this days, the number of will be decreased i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 868, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s days, the number of will be decreased in future. In short, all the aformentioned reaso...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, for example, in short, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55157894737 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56706953224 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.1366464284 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.133333333 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 20.6045352989 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278272108314 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10800579247 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911147660401 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200099750292 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575007065866 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.