Recently, there has a debate about the approaches that might be used to stop the increasing in cane toad population in Australia, the author in the reading passage comes up with three approaches to solve this problem, while, the professor in the lecture completely disagrees with all these approaches and argues each on extensively.
Recently, there has a debate about the approaches that might be used to stop the increasing in cane toad population in Australia, the author in the reading passage comes up with three approaches to solve this problem, while, the professor in the lecture completely disagrees with all these approaches and argues each on extensively.
First of all, the professor asserts that the building a fence in order to stop the spreading of cane toad to other areas in Australia, is unsuccessful idea, because the cane toad offsprings and eggs are usually living in water stream, so building a fence probably not that effective to prevent them from spreading to other area, especially, they are so tiny and can easily pass through the fence, unlike rabbit which is living just in the land and they are already large in size. Therefore, the author fence theory is not practically possible.
Second, the lecturer maintain an opposite side of view regarding the capturing of cane toad by a team of volunteers, because this kind of untrained team might be harmful to the nature rather than beneficial, they easily can capture the native frogs instead of cane toad, in fact, they are similar to each other particularly the young frogs, so that would be so destroyable to the native frog and would affect the natural distribution of them. Admittedly, the professor digs a hole in the second theory that had been mentioned in the text.
Finally, the lecturer thinks that the idea of creating a virus to kill the cane toad, is a horrible idea, because this virus may arrive in the United States and affect the cane toad in there, how can that happen? the answer is a lot of researchers get insects and pets from Australia, then, they may be carrying this virus and infected the cane toad in the United States and that would lead to destroyed the cane toad population in the United States and disrupted the ecosystem in there. By this point, the lecture successfully argues the third approach that has been written by the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, there has a debate about the a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oaches and argues each on extensively. First of all, the professor asserts that...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se the cane toad offsprings and eggs are usually living in water stream, so build...
^^
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...g just in the land and they are already large in size. Therefore, the author fence theory is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce theory is not practically possible. Second, the lecturer maintain an opposit...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y that had been mentioned in the text. Finally, the lecturer thinks that the id...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ane toad in there, how can that happen? the answer is a lot of researchers get inse...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, may, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, third, while, in fact, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 347.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80691642651 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55023851818 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487031700288 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 21.2450331126 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 149.752295475 49.2860985944 304% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 208.5 110.228320801 189% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.375 21.698381199 200% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.75 7.06452816374 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434951688526 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190005878117 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.247327376924 0.0662205650399 373% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309412489126 0.162205337803 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.305557580103 0.0443174109184 689% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.9 13.3589403974 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.0289183223 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.7273730684 256% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.498013245 183% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.