Recently, there has a debate about the approaches that might be used to stop the increasing in cane toad population in Australia, the author in the reading passage comes up with three approaches to solve this problem, while, the professor in the lecture completely disagrees with all these approaches and argues each on extensively.
The reading and the lecture are both about the cane toad species is being an invasive species to australia, which was introduced as a solution to protect farmer's crops from pests. The author of the reading believes there are three possible ways to eliminate this invasive species. The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. she is of the opinion that they would like to be unsuccessful.
First of all, the author sugges that building a national fence could help this problem by preventing the cane toads moving to uncolonized areas. it is mentioned that the spread of rabbits, another invasive species, were controlled by such way. The argument is refuted by the lecturer. she says the toads' eggs and younglings are found near bodies of water, particularly rivers and springs. So one way or another such young toads would be carried by river to other areas. Furthermore, she argues that even if we toads are left alive they can multiply fast.
Secondly, the article posits that the toads could be captured and eliminated by volunteers. The article notes that the toads are easy to find and their younglings are even more easier to find and be captured. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that untrained volunteers could kill other frogs and amphibians. she elaborates on this by mentiong that the cane toad and Australian native frogs look similar especially when they are young.
Finally, it is stated in the article that a disease causing virus could erdicate the toad species. The author establishes that even though that virus could infect other amphibians, it wouldn't harm them. The lecturer, on the other hand, opposes that the cane toads in the original continient could be affected by the virus. she puts forth the idea that many visitors come to australia to get reptiles and amphibians. As a result, the virus would spread easily to the natural habitat of the toad cane.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ays to eliminate this invasive species. The lecturer challenges the statements made...
^^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...nges the statements made by the author. she is of the opinion that they would like ...
^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...cane toads moving to uncolonized areas. it is mentioned that the spread of rabbits...
^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...he argument is refuted by the lecturer. she says the toads eggs and younglings are ...
^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...y to find and their younglings are even more easier to find and be captured. The lecturer, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... could kill other frogs and amphibians. she elaborates on this by mentiong that the...
^^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...virus could infect other amphibians, it wouldnt harm them. The lecturer, on the other h...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...tinient could be affected by the virus. she puts forth the idea that many visitors ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94099378882 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51890923735 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534161490683 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3752158776 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7368421053 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201095248159 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615886377574 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434079260903 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13045011977 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502607062436 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.