Rembrandt
The reading and the lecture are both about a real author of a well-known painting "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet". The author of the reading believes that counting this work to Rembrandt was a mistake. The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. First of all, the author suggests that woman's outfit is confusing and contradicts painter's accuracy to details. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that according to the last researches, it came to light, that a luxurious fur collar was not a part of an original image and was added only 100 years later. Secondly, the writer contends that a combination of light and shadow are at a low level. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that the original painting looked realistic, but was spoiled by a later owner. Finally, it is stated in the article that the whole work is situated on the panel made of several pieces of wood glued together and that is unprecedented from a perspective of Rembrandt's creations. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that it was made by a greedy successor in order to provide the portrait with higher price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g this work to Rembrandt was a mistake. The lecturer challenges the statements made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, second, secondly, so, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82619421438 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7442733766 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101897800778 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414008390373 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844345960083 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101897800778 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.