robustus dinosaurs
The author of the reading and the professor of the listening discuss if the Robustus was a hunter or scavenger. More specifically, while the author supports the idea that they were a scavenger, enumerating three possible explanations. The professor, however, is not on the same wavelength for several reasons. He explains the drawbacks of the writer’s claim in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the writer beings by stating that the Robustus, like other mammals, had a little size to be considered a hunter. Moreover, in the stomach of Robustus, researchers only found dinosaurs egg, supporting the idea that Robustus were not hunters; instead, they could be opportunists. The professor, on the other hand, casts doubt on this point by saying that it is true they were smaller, but they were bigger than baby Psittacousurs dinosaurs. Furthermore, specialists in this area suggest that the relation size mass between the Robustus and that there was found in the Robustus stomach is strong evidence to say they were hunters.
Second, the reading posits that some characteristic of Robustus legs such as their locations and their size is evidence to say that they could not catch prays, because they can not run faster and chase it. The lecturer, however, disagrees with this viewpoint. He compares both the Tasmania devil and the Robustus, and they have similar legs features, short and in the side position. These existing animals can run around fifteen km per hour, and they are successful hunters since Robustus could have had the same abilities to chase prey.
As the final point, the article claims that Robustus teeth should have been left some marks on bones found it in their stomach, supporting the idea that they were hunters. Again, the professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s argument. He holds that the Robustus had a strong jaw, and they did not use their back teeth, they swallowed entire prey or big pieces.
In conclusion, both the author and the professor hold conflicting views about Robustus were hunter dinosaurs. It is clear they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 351.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09401709402 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64207498431 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527065527066 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4780300881 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.176470588 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249642169477 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807250532248 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913129917838 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132690299041 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728390655041 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.