rococo architects impact on nineteenth century
The lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the rococo painting style tautening in the nineteenth century. While the reading states that although the Rococo art was significant till the eighteenth century, it becomes less popular in the following century. The lecture refutes this, saying that the reading clime is misinterpreting and pointing out one way.
First of all, the reading claims that the rococo art lost the reputation because of their arrogance. However, the professor argues that even though there has been a long criticism of rococo architecture, they are also working for the general community instead of working only for wealthy people. Furthermore, the professor states that they decorated the churches and public parks.
in addition, the reading makes the argument that they limited their work general matters such as lover in picnic and playing games rather giving a valuable message to the society. the lecture counters this point by stating that it is a misinterpretation. According to the professor, their architecture was responsible for communities because they designed the public parks and historical building to patriate the history.
lastly, the reading avers that their designs were the most expensive because they spend a lot of money to develop create colors. Thre professor oppose this claim by pointing they are innovators because they use to experiment with colors to create new designs
- organic food vs non-organic food 70
- Some people believe it is better to have a university degree for a better carrier and others prefer practical knowledge. Which one do you prefer and why. Explain with suitable examples. 70
- Which technology, in your opinion, has had the greatest impact on your lives? Why? Use examples and reasons to support your argument.1)Smartphone2)Television3)Cars 66
- decreased preference of novel reading and its impact on the society 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the rococo painting style tautening in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...orated the churches and public parks. in addition, the reading makes the argumen...
^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ving a valuable message to the society. the lecture counters this point by stating ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...ical building to patriate the history. lastly, the reading avers that their designs w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, while, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36725663717 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73950985496 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592920353982 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3057503378 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.272727273 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0697084065934 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306847279654 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486651959284 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434345343423 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454128284551 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.