Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they challenge points made in the reading.
The text and the lecture offer two opposing views on modern innovations. While the test lists reasons to support the claim that modern discoveries are influenced by various nations all around the world, the professor counters those specific reasons and support the significance of current innovations.
First, the lecture refutes the idea that earlier the camera was invented by Japan scientist thousand years earlier than the French discovery. He stated that that camera was not popular until French discovery and none of them were used it. Although the passage states Japan is camera inventors, the professor believes that until French discovery it is not possible to print and present the image. Overall, she summarized that the French camera was a completely new machine.
Next, the professor says that write brothers are probably a fist inventors of the motor flight. Although, the passage posits brazil scientist discover the flight, the professor suspicious this point because they used hydrogen balloon to fly the machine rather a motor. it occupies a lot of space and easily catches fire. so, the professor feels it is not an actual machine and even not safe to fly.
lastly, the lecture opposes the claim that the first armoires are designed by chines. he illustrated that the china made equipment is too heavy and need at least two persons to handle. Even though the reading says that the armories invented by China, the professor, certainly believe European armies are the true inventores because they designed the machinery to handle easily on a battlefield.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... camera was invented by Japan scientist thousand years earlier than the French discovery...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch camera was a completely new machine. Next, the professor says that write brot...
^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...loon to fly the machine rather a motor. it occupies a lot of space and easily catc...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...a lot of space and easily catches fire. so, the professor feels it is not an actua...
^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctual machine and even not safe to fly. lastly, the lecture opposes the claim th...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...al machine and even not safe to fly. lastly, the lecture opposes the claim that the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... first armoires are designed by chines. he illustrated that the china made equipme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52130941247 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9121573493 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.538461538 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 7.06452816374 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0831247651955 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026565225658 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289878958911 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0437111136974 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232864377899 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.