the salinity of waters
The reading and the lecture are both about the salinity of water in a lake. The author of the reading mentions that there are several ways to reduce the level of salinity the lake has. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt the idea of the reading when she says that the solutions are unreal and not practical.
First, it is mention in the reading that exist a possibility of reducing the level of salt in the lake. This would be heating the water until it evaporate. As a result salt would be left and the water in the lake would have less salt. However the professor refutes this idea. She mentions that if water is evaporated, not only would have salt after that, but also would have others solid materials as a selenium that will be dangerous for human's health.
Second, the author of the reading says that another solution is mixing the water from the lake with water from the ocean through pipelines or canals, as a result the water in the lake will be more diluted and less salty. On the other hand, the professor disagrees this. She adds that the construction of pipelines and canals are very expensive, the local government does not have resources to allow the building of this pipelines.
Finally, the reading states that would be a good idea if in the lakes would build many walls that divided the grade of salinity in the waters. On the other hand the professor mentions that this it is not a good idea because due the earthquakes the walls that separated the different waters could collapse and the waters from one level of salinity would mix with the other one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...water in the lake would have less salt. However the professor refutes this idea. She me...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...have resources to allow the building of this pipelines. Finally, the reading state...
^^^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a good idea because due the earthquakes the walls that separated the different w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53846153846 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23247846481 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447552447552 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3898204849 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8461538462 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290728553055 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114684717748 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122474539061 0.0662205650399 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197154827911 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577961048839 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.2367328918 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.