shortening workweek
The reading and the lecture are both about working time sheet. The reading passage explains three different options of working just four hours a week and the lecture contradicts these options.
First, the reading states that employees in The United States prefer working four hours a week because they will benefit from the policy. On the other hand, the lecture refutes the idea when the professor mentions that working four days a week will force the company to spend more money. Adding more employees the company will have to pay medical insurance if work four or five employees. Also, they have to increase more space and computers and that will cut into the company's profit.
Secondly, the reading states that if the employees work fewer hours the unemployment will be reduced. On the other side, the lecturer mentions that will not be many jobs available and the companies should offer overtime to the workers.
Finally, the reading states that reducing the hours to four days a week would be a benefit for employees and their families because they will have the possibility to spend time with their families. The professor disagrees, when he says that more free time, will reduce the quality of life and also decrease the job stability. Employees that work four days a week are likely to lose their jobs. Also, companies prefer five days working because they are more qualified to manage the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he lecture contradicts these options. First, the reading states that employees...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat will cut into the companys profit. Secondly, the reading states that if the...
^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eek are likely to lose their jobs. Also, companies prefer five days working becau...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26479942433 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474789915966 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6693924192 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.