salt and lake
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about several ways of reversing the trend that threatens lake's health. Considering this, the author claims that fortunately these ways exist and work. The professor, on the other hand, casts doubt on it and categorically denies whatever mentioned in the reading through refuting three possible ways by providing some reasons.
First of all, both the author and the professor talk about direct removal of salt from the lake's water. According to the passage, water of the lakes would be pumped into facilities and heat, so it will be evaporated. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the author's viewpoint and illustrates the idea that maybe this method works, but it causes several problems which lead to health risks. She mentions that it can cause the increase in some toxic chemicals such as Selenium. Consequently, breathing in of people can be so dangerous, and it is terrible.
Second, both the reading and the lecture discuss the issue of diluting the salt level of the lake with water from the ocean. The passage goes on to mention that since ocean water is less salty, so adding it to the lake water can decrease the lake's salinity. Nonetheless, the lecturer supports a contradictory view as compared to that presented in the reading. She describes that as the passage mentioned this method needs canals and pipelines which are mostly expensive for transporting water in long distances. As a result, in some cases, governments do not have these resources for doing such a method
Eventually, the passage and the talk both address the subject of controlling the lake's salinity through constructing some walls. The author of the reading states that these walls divide the lake into several sections .However, the speaker refutes it, saying that this idea is unlikely to work for a long time since intense geological actions such as earthquakes can separate different sections. As a result, walls collapse with each other and , in some cases, water with high level of salinity mixes and comes back with lower salt level and so the density of salt increases in lower level one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the authors viewpoint and illustrates the idea that...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...g it to the lake water can decrease the lakes salinity. Nonetheless, the lecturer sup...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
... address the subject of controlling the lakes salinity through constructing some wall...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ls divide the lake into several sections .However, the speaker refutes it, saying ...
^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... divide the lake into several sections .However, the speaker refutes it, saying that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sult, walls collapse with each other and , in some cases, water with high level of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, such as, as a result, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01123595506 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59733204416 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51404494382 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6718424005 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.933333333 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258256516305 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843010252963 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985866499775 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162180437073 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603969020628 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.