The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake.
Both the reading and the lecture are talking about the procedures than could be used to save the fish in Salton Sea in California. The reading part supports the idea that there are several ways to solve this issues. On the other hand,the lecture opposes this opportunity.
First, the passage supports the idea that removing the salt from the lakes' water in special desalination facilities, where the water will be pumped and heated. In this way the water will evaporate into steam and the salt and other materials will be left behind, and the water that will be returned into the sea will be less salty. However, the lecture disagrees with this, because it says when the water will evaporate it will leave behind other chemical materials that could be unhealthy and toxic for the people. For example, said the selenium is toxic and the people can breathe it and it is very danger.
Another possible way to reduce the salt from the water given from the reading part is to dilute the salt level in the lake with water from the ocean. But the listening part opposes this, by saying that this method is very expensive and the local government will not have the sources to pay for that construction.
Finally, the author gives one more option, to control the lake's salinity by building walls to divide the lake into several areas. In contrast, the lecturer says this method is unlikely to work for so long. She says that there are earthquakes that can destroy the wall and the water from different sections will mix in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lecture are talking about the procedures than could be used to save the fish in S...
^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... to solve this issues. On the other hand,the lecture opposes this opportunity. F...
^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d,the lecture opposes this opportunity. First, the passage supports the idea tha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...r gives one more option, to control the lakes salinity by building walls to divide th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, for example, in contrast, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70786516854 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23327149672 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486891385768 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6662289892 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0799906620487 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322099223164 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520940872144 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0571251238876 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322158424822 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.