Salty land is going to be erected. So we build up some solution. But proper logic will remove solution as it is unrealsitic
The article states that the Salton Sea in California is turning to a massive salty intake land, a burning question in the town and it provides three potential solutions. However, the professor explains that these reasons are entirely unrealistic and infeasible and refutes each of the author's reasons quite comfortably with proper logics.
First, the reading claims that desalination method is a sophisticated contrivance. In respect of it, water from the lake will be pumped and heated in order to evaporate into steam and others materials dissolved in the water. As a result, salt will be extracted. Though it seems a perfect way, turning to the other side of the logic, the professor refutes this point by saying that desalination method will create serious health hazards. Here it's referable that solid materials fallen after evaporation disperses everywhere in the air. Therefore, when people breaths, polluted air will trigger setbacks as it is clogged. This substantiate that the logic based on the solution is half-dead solution which can’t be taken.
Second, the article posits that creating a dilute salt by dint of 20% less salty water from the Pacific Ocean can easily reduce the extent of salinity. However, the lecture says that by far it is one of the most immature steps to be perceived. Besides, in order to mixing pacific water into the lake,1000km long pipeline or canal is to be installed which is very onerous to setup and maintenance. Moreover such pipeline needs huge amount of money that the local government lacks to attain this goal. So, this short-sighted pondering is a one kind of hoax in the perspective of the reading.
Third, the reading says that lake's salinity can be minimized by constructing walls to separate the lake into several sections. Which is why, the main and largest section salinity will be lessened and eventually it will direct all fresh river water to flow into the main section of the lake. On the other hand, the professor is in the reverse opinion about this point. He clearly says that geological activity like earthquake and other natural calamities easily bamboozle it and make it ineffective. For instance, every year, more often than not, earthquake attacks into the section of the waterways as well as land. In the similar pattern it will annihilate the section wall undoubtedly and the overall project will go in vain. In consideration of this concept, we easily understand this semi-solution is not a satisfactory to grab our exact outcome.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 372, Rule ID: CAN_SETUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to set up'?
Suggestion: to set up
...s to be installed which is very onerous to setup and maintenance. Moreover such pipeline...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 398, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... very onerous to setup and maintenance. Moreover such pipeline needs huge amount of mone...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...ding. Third, the reading says that lakes salinity can be minimized by constructi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, for instance, kind of, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1373.03311258 154% => OK
No of words: 414.0 270.72406181 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09903381643 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74655419445 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 145.348785872 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567632850242 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 419.366225166 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6863382715 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.523809524 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175980691492 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046732734451 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408638620134 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936664323176 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334492253572 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 63.6247240618 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.