Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society
No one denies the word morality as it is the mainstay to brandish the environment in a way whatever the world people imagine. In the purview of the development of the society, moral responsibility and commitment is a greater issue than any other tonic point. By noticing these points, more often than not, a systematic word matters us that only moral education or moral reasoning is very crucial in order to sharpen the young thought from the boyhood. In view of it, I wholeheartedly opine in the positive notion to the second part of the statement and will substantiate to uphold logic to prove it.
To embark on, morality is the thwart force to ornate the society, so its teaching is a pivotal element. In this respect none is in the opposite opinion, but how the teaching way, obviously all will express in a different way. For instance, if a student is taught only moral education like a parrot, so they will not apply it in practical as its sense of humor is not reached to the mind , rather it wanders the outside of his head. Moreover, he totally fails to understand what is going on this scenario. From my personal experience, the student of our locality, everyday steal mango from our neighbor farm and one day I caught one and asked him whether he knew to steal is a sin. Undoubtedly, I was discombobulated as he reacted it that morality is kept into only books. So, it clearly expresses that education system of moral education should be based on moral reasoning.
Furthermore, if we teach our students the real gist of morality they can easily catch the real scene what should his conduct, why he is bound to the rule of the society. As a result, their thinking capability will merge on the moral education. Whenever we teach him if a person adulterate with pure milk and water, he basically swindle everyone and its format inspires all to think wrongly. In the long run, all people will be impediment to this ill work. For example, if we teach our student that Microsoft every year uses lower chip in order to insert new hardware modulation, so not only his customers but also all environments is addicted is hampered. By emulating Microsoft, others software and hardware company also uses it in that manner. Finally, total environment of dignity of pure chip makes us a mirage. That thinking is a crucial need to evoke the student from the inception of their learning.
Last but not least, it is well assumed that moral reasoning makes our capability of thinking a well embellished way. Whenever you are moral, you have to be honest and firm to your determination. Like, if I am honest and moral, I will not tell a lie in my business whatever I do in my life. Besides it helps us to work rationally. When I am a society member, my judgment to work, my focus to work really increases. I will find out the efficient honest way to promulgate this teaching. From my personal experience, when some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society a chance in the university, my morality adjuvants me to the responsibility of my family. Moreover, it reminds me that my life is not self-centered. I have to fulfill the dream of my parent with a cool way. Such teaching is really needed in order to understand life. So, it is clearly a right option to understand that moral reasoning we have to promulgate among students.
To wrap it up, it is hard to make conclusion in tis open ended question. But it is lucid to understand my purview that moral reasoning is the most fabulous way in order to inculcate the teaching to the students. We basically dream a world where only characteristics of balanced goal will come. No matter where we are and what we do, without moral reasoning it’s a hoax to imagine a better world and it is possibly by only reasoning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eaching way, obviously all will express in a different way. For instance, if a student is taught o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a parrot, so they will not apply it in practical as its sense of humor is not r...
^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ense of humor is not reached to the mind , rather it wanders the outside of his he...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'swindles'.
Suggestion: swindles
... with pure milk and water, he basically swindle everyone and its format inspires all to...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 908, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t from the inception of their learning. Last but not least, it is well assumed t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...n my business whatever I do in my life. Besides it helps us to work rationally. When I ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, so, well, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 91.0 33.0505617978 275% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3218.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 691.0 442.535393258 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65701881331 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.12707312764 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77570838436 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458755426918 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1047.6 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0135036428 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9428571429 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7428571429 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356962973792 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813958740954 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115248612959 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180803536539 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962116537207 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.