Salvage logging
Both the article and the lecture was about salvage logging which is defined to be removing dead trees out of forest. The passage states that it is a crucial act for maintaining the forest healthy and provides three reasons of support. however the professor refutes each of these reasons.
First, the article states that by removing trees out of the forest there will be more room for new trees to grow up. Nevertheless professor indicates that however it may lead to more room for new trees but decomposition of these dead trees in nature, enriches the soil and provide it crucial nutriants
Second, the article claims that dead trees is a very good habitat for insects which will harm the forest, and if trees remain in the forest the population of insects will increase. however the lecture refutes this reason by claiming that, these dead trees are o good habitat for other usefull birds and insects too. she avers that these usefull birds and insects are of paramount importance for the live in forest.
Third, the passage claims that salvage logging also have economical advantages and the dead trees can be used for their remaing wood and it also provides addition jobs. The lecture refutes the economical advantages. The professor avers that removing the trees out of forest will need helicopters and big vehicles which are very expensive and it wouldn't be aconomical. she also believes that these jobs are temperory.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... and provides three reasons of support. however the professor refutes each of these rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
... and provides three reasons of support. however the professor refutes each of these rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
... be more room for new trees to grow up. Nevertheless professor indicates that however it may...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...he population of insects will increase. however the lecture refutes this reason by clai...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
...he population of insects will increase. however the lecture refutes this reason by clai...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...or other usefull birds and insects too. she avers that these usefull birds and inse...
^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ehicles which are very expensive and it wouldnt be aconomical. she also believes that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...expensive and it wouldnt be aconomical. she also believes that these jobs are tempe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95020746888 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39259746915 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464730290456 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.2646826987 49.2860985944 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.454545455 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0886748065578 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435054883694 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931437981998 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756059832282 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770946694019 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.