According to the passage, there are three possible difficulties which make round-trip to Mars impossible for human being. By disapproving them one by one, the professor states that although the trip to Mars is definitely challenging, however, some scientists have suggested some solutions. Accordingly, the lecturer provides three plausible solutions.
First, the author posits that providing supplies of food, water and oxygen for a long period as long as two years is one of the hardships that astronauts are facing. On contrary, the speaker opposes this by introducing a solution namely hydroponic planting technique. To more clarification, she states that astronauts can use the new method to plant their required crops there at the spaceship which will demands relatively little space. Additionally, the plants produce oxygen in photosynthesis process which meets the needs of astronauts for fresh air. Also, recycling the waste water will prepare fresh water in the spaceship.
Second, the texts asserts that spending an extended time in zero gravity state affects the people, adversely. While the speaker opposed the declaration by demonstrating that several spaceships have been lunched before and astronauts have experienced the zero-gravity many times. As a result, they have learned some techniques to overcome the side effects of the zero-gravity. Doing exercises, they improve their muscles and also taking vitamins enhances their bones density.
Third, the text claims that being exposed to the space radiation can have harmful effects on the individual’s bodies. Conversely, the lecturer refutes the assertion by illustrating that sun radiation will not cause dangers for the astronauts. Clarifying it, the radiation is just occasionally and does not last for a long time. Consequently, if the spaceship was equipped with a monitoring system, detection of the time of radiation will be possible. Having a small shelter on the spaceship can prevent the people from exposing radiation as the time. They can stay safely there shielded until the radiation decreases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shielded until the radiation decreases.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56603773585 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99631248919 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.531448294 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0922013705641 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272695286983 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361874679373 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057901032863 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449972897979 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 63.6247240618 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.