Sea otter
Both the lecture and the passage discuss the extinction of the sea otter, a small mammal that lives in the waters located from the coast of California to the one of Alaska. The passage suggests that the disappearance is due to environmental factors while the professor claims that it is due to a predator' invasion.
The reading passage argues that pollution may be the cause of the sea otter extinction because along the Alaskan coast there were pollutants such as oil rigs. In addition, the author pointed the fact that many other animals, such as whales, sharing the otter's habitat also declined, which supports the hypothesis of environmental issues as a cause of otters' extinction. The professor counters the idea of pollution and claims that predation is the reason why the population of sea otter declined.
The professor states that since there are no dead otter, it becomes obvious that they were consumed by predators. The professor disapprove the idea that the population of whales decreased because of environmental factors. He said that the number of whales declined because the extinction of sea ottles, one of their food source, made them starve and eventually die.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...er animals, such as whales, sharing the otters habitat also declined, which supports t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s that they were consumed by predators. The professor disapprove the idea that the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'disapproves'.
Suggestion: disapproves
...re consumed by predators. The professor disapprove the idea that the population of whales ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08205128205 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72657556885 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54358974359 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.542629884 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.875 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35283355316 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146947256252 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105132830421 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230864038596 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940973151735 0.0443174109184 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.