Shakespeare's literary works
Both the reading and the listening are about the fame of William Shakespeare's literary works. The former argues that the facts regarding the fame of Shakespeare were just rumors and theories, and supports that his creations were written by other people rather than himself. However, the listening contrasts this idea by disagreeing the facts presented in the passage.
To start, the passage mentions a famous scientist, theorist and philosopher Francis Bacon, who supported the ideas reflected in Shakespeare's poems like "Venus and Adonis" and got the legal support as well. In contrast, the the listening refutes this point as mis-understanding of the fact. The lecturer points that the astronomical ideas presented in the Shakespeare's plays do not match with the ideas of Francis Bacon.
Secondly, the reading text put forward the name of C. Marlowe, whose death was faked to escape religious trials and he was believed to be named as William Shakespeare. The listening directly refute this idea. The lecturer condemns that the fact that C. Marlowe as unreligious person has no meaning, as he was not criminal. Furthermore, he mentions that C. Marlowe was died earlier in 1593 and that has nothing to do with W. Shakespeare.
Finally, the author claims that Edward de Vere, an English nobleman and courtier, used the false name William Shakespeare to as he was unable to gain public credits. On the other hand, the lecturer rejects this idea by saying that Edward died before the Shakespeare's display. He further mentions that no one could now how Shakespeare would think.
Thus, the listening directly opposes the three evidences against the Shakespeare's literary works reported in the passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-18 | RicardoRH | 71 | view |
| 2021-02-03 | Safa Arshad | 83 | view |
| 2021-01-06 | bhimsen | 81 | view |
| 2015-06-02 | SarahAlsalihi | 65 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 62
- Claim The emergence of the online blogosphere has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decl 66
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 52
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...the legal support as well. In contrast, the the listening refutes this point as mis-und...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...the legal support as well. In contrast, the the listening refutes this point as mis-und...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27737226277 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83928470602 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.824536416 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0588235294 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227092257253 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652675476225 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101363787982 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151356368449 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12671688271 0.0443174109184 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.