signs of volaco eruption
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the Yellowstone Caldera volcano. The reading states that there is a possibility of this volcano eruption now and provides three theories to prove the signs. The professor, on the other hand, explains that these signs do not show that volcano is going to explode soon and gainsays each of the theories mentioned in the article.
First and foremost, the article begins by asserting that a scientist has discovered an enormous magma reservoir beneath the volcano, due to which the supervolcano has been collecting magma for a long time. Thus, it will result in a big explosion. However, the professor describes that to observe this kind of huge reservoir advanced types of equipment are required that are not available yet. Moreover, a huge magma chamber does not mean that volcano is going to erupt soon. In fact, the majority of the magma is present in rock form. Therefore, this is a sign that there will be no eruption in the upcoming time.
Next, the professor further points into details that plateaus are formed in such a way that when they breathe, it results in the rising and fall of the surface. The rapid rise of the surface of the Yellow stone is due to breathing and in fact, it has fallen now. These claims refute the writer's implication about explosion due to the rise of the surface of the volcano. Thus, this sign does not indicate the eruption of the volcano.
Ultimately, the article wraps its argument by declaring the third theory of increasing seismic activity. According to this theory, there have been swarms of earthquakes happening around the area. So, eventually, it will trigger the eruption. In contrast, the speaker rebuts this point by showing the inaccuracy of the author that eruptions and earthquakes are not related. Since earthquakes release some of the pressure from underground heat, it reduces the chances of explosion. Therefore, it has been noted that even very close earthquakes did not affect the volcano.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...has fallen now. These claims refute the writers implication about explosion due to the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... not related. Since earthquakes release some of the pressure from underground heat, it redu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, so, therefore, third, thus, in contrast, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96119402985 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5980097597 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534328358209 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4541466837 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4736842105 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143062521267 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483452731011 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856735898418 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880458284766 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029978557391 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.