Skakespear
Both the reading and the lecture discuss William Shakespeare's works. While the reading passage claims that there were other people wrote under his Shakespear's name, The lecture argues that none of the possible assumptions that the passage has claimed about is true. He provides three reasons for support to his arguments as follows.
Firstly, the speaker contradicts the idea that says Francis Bacon could have written the Shakespear's poems. He explains that Francis had used different terms in his poems that Shakespear's poems had which was misunderstood by Shakespear's works and ideas. Thus, completely, refuted what the reading has claimed about.
Secondly, the professor challenged the author's assumption about Marlowe and if he could have been written by Shakespear's poets. He reveals that actually, Marlowe had died before Shakespeare's poets had released and revised. In addition, he had died in a religious criminal long before Shakespear's poet revision which unlikely he could have written Shakespear's work
Finally, the lecture opposes the suggestion that mentions that de Vera could have written the work of Shakespeare. This is because he died in 1904 and the work of Shakespear released in 1921. Therefore, he might not have been written on Shakespear's work. Thus, again goes against what the text claimed
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... Secondly, the professor challenged the authors assumption about Marlowe and if he coul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 207.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41062801932 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68044992136 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.0462029031 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.