Smart cars
The professor explains the reasons why technology of smart cars doesn't provide clear advantages. The information she presents directly contrasts facts outlined in the reading passage.
First of all, the speaker mentions that because these computer-controlled cars can follow one another closely, the accidents happened will involve more accidents and thereby failing to save lives. On the other hand, the reading specifies that by implementing GPS system and a variety of sensors on cars, the number of accidents will decrease since the cars will automatically control braking and turning to prevent crash with other cars and walls.
Second, regarding highway speed and commuting time, the professor states that using smart cars will not reduce traffic congestion significantly. She backs off this statement by saying that more and more cars enter the roads annually as to corroborate the current traffic situation. Nonetheless, the reading includes the information that in practical, the traffic problems will disappear because the cars follow each other, thus increasing highway speeds and bringing advantage to many people commuting by car.
Last but not least, the speaker points out that smart cars don't make people save money as predicted in the reading. She claims that installing a global positioning system and a wide variety of sensors, however, would add more expenses than the save on harnessing these technologies. However, according to the reading, smart cars will save people much money since by installing these technologies, the drivers can find the most efficient route and save such amount of money on repairs and replacement parts of the cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he reasons why technology of smart cars doesnt provide clear advantages. The informati...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the speaker points out that smart cars dont make people save money as predicted in ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nonetheless', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'as to', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.281690140845 0.261695866417 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.147887323944 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0845070422535 0.0723426182421 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0528169014085 0.0435111971325 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0105633802817 0.0277247811725 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116197183099 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.056338028169 0.0370669169778 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78910965907 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0176056338028 0.0208969081088 84% => OK
Particles: 0.00352112676056 0.00154638098197 228% => OK
Determiners: 0.116197183099 0.128158765124 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0316901408451 0.0158828679856 200% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00704225352113 0.0114777025283 61% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1665.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 259.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.42857142857 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.409266409266 0.374372842146 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.328185328185 0.287516216867 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216216216216 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.113142543107 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78910965907 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 57.9117343416 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 25.9 21.7502111507 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5668630914 49.3711431718 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.5 132.220823453 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 21.7502111507 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 0.878197800319 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 58.7185328185 50.5018328374 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.15 1.90840788429 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213850137875 0.549887131256 39% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131374838332 0.142949733639 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0716562022927 0.0787303798458 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.695829626546 0.631733273073 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0952382983 0.139662658121 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126488239847 0.266732575781 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912569088458 0.103435571967 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.36630417861 0.414875509568 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.067004003294 0.0530846634433 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164772077305 0.40443939384 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187446549082 0.0528353158467 35% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.