Smart cars
The reading and the lecturer is about the future of smart cars. The author of the reading presents three ideas supporting the advantages that smart cars will provide in the near future. The professor challenges each one of the ideas of the author. I will explain how she does this.
First, the author notes that smart cars will be safer, furthermore. eventually, more people will drive more smarts cars due to the fact to people are drawn the comfortable that smart car provides. The lecturer contradicts this idea. She believes that because there will be more cars on the streets, accidents will occur and will result in pile-ups. Furthermore, machines do make mistakes, resulting in crashes with fatal or injured people.
Second, according to the author if the reading, commuting time will greatly be decreased due to the fact that smart cars will be driving at a higher speed. The professor disagrees with this idea. She argues that because the number of cars on the road will increase then the commute time will be much slower too. Having more cars on the streets will no be an advantage.
Lastly, the cost of driving will decrease due to less use of parts like breaks. Not the case, according to the professor, cars parts will be a lot more expensive. Moreover, sensors and technological components of the cars will increase the cost of driving exponentially.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t cars will provide in the near future. The professor challenges each one of the id...
^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Eventually
... smart cars will be safer, furthermore. eventually, more people will drive more smarts car...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... of cars on the road will increase then the commute time will be much slower too. Having mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: NOW[3]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...o. Having more cars on the streets will no be an advantage. Lastly, the cost of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89699570815 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54777338473 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523605150215 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2949624593 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.3125 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5625 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333718054597 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129965762473 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134884128806 0.0662205650399 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236646931858 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843868597973 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.