Spartacus: the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves
The reading passage state that spartacus as a rebel leader who fought against the roman army as a hero. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article spartacus original goal in his conflict that he wants to return home. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that return home is not the only goal of spsrtacus and his men but he wants more such as revenge and wealth because he was so ambitious.
Second, the reading claims that spartacus and his men were so small army and he was a professional army man. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justified the information presented in the reading and makes the point that actually the roman government not take him seriously, so they sent a poor army to defeat him but after roman failure romans sent a better army to fought aginst him.
Third, the author in the reading passage puts forward the idea that spsrtacus librate all roman slaves and rejected a roman senator position. In the same way, the speaker justified the idea and adds that this is a story by the antislavery movement and they want a hero for their movement, so they make such this story.
To sum up, both the writer and professor holding conflicting views about Spartacus as a hero. It's clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-26 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | ShuEyy | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | nusybah | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
- The reading passage claims that there are several possible causes for the little ice age such as Gulf Stream volcanic eruption and indirect human activities However the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the reading 70
- the disadvantage and advantage of online encyclopedias 80
- fossils collector business
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- telling the truth in relationships 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, such as, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72950819672 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43737746817 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532786885246 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2121483833 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214346825242 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926621792992 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137143610026 0.0662205650399 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124714425751 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118564414849 0.0443174109184 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.