believe that airships could become popular again.
Recently, there has been a ton of debate as to believe that airships could become popular again. More specifically, in regards to the passage, the writer puts forth the idea that an airship offers a number of advantages compare with aircraft. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out there are some serious flaws in the writer's claims. In fact, the professor believes the airships do not become popular and widely use in the future, and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point made in the reading test.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states that the airships use less fuel than typical aircraft and they are more efficient than any of them. Some professionals in the same field, however, stand in firm opposition to this claim. In the listening for example, the professor states every airship uses Helium and Hedrosion as fuel. But Hedrosion is so sensitive toward fire and Helium is so expensive. He goes on to say that this is not an economic solution.
One group of scholars represented by the writer , think that the airships are capable to carry l heavy loads easily. Of course, though, not are experts in the field believe this is accurate. Again, the speaker specifically addresses this point when he states on the challenge and says that airships are so light and large. So they are not so steady and maybe damage when carry logs through forests.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that an airship could even be used to replace satellites. Not surprisingly, the speaker takes issue with his claim by contending that the problem is about strong wind in high latitude and also a lot of fuel that need for serviseing function.
To sum up both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about using airships in the future. It's clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...ecome popular again. More specifically, in regards to the passage, the writer puts forth the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...up of scholars represented by the writer , think that the airships are capable to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, in fact, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84161490683 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47335676719 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555900621118 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5070974756 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7058823529 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288793999284 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899852242276 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155141749709 0.0662205650399 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139411567225 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132176292665 0.0443174109184 298% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.