The reading passage claims that Peary did reach the North Pole, and provide strong supports for his claim. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the reading.
The reading passage claims that Peary did reach the North Pole, and provide strong supports for his claim. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article the National Geographic Society investigation of Peary's records and concluded that Peary's accounts were consistent. In the same way, the professor in the lecture validates the idea and adds that committee was completely objective and most of them were his friends, in this way maybe their confirm seems bias.
Second, the reading claims that skeptics use to argue that Peary could not have traveled so fast and only in 37 days. However, the article provides report about a British explorer that recently made the same trek in less than 37 days. Admittedly, the speaker justified the information presented in the reading and make the points that explorer' s travel was not similar Peary's journey because Peary carry a lot of foods and equipment with his ship during the travel and that kind of thing made his ship so heavy for moving so fast in 37 days toward North Pole.
Third, the writer puts forward the idea that there are some photos were taken by Peary and support his claim. In contrast, the professor holds a conflicting view about the photos and makes the points that these pictures captured with primary camera, and most of them are blur.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...econd, the reading claims that skeptics use to argue that Peary could not have trav...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, kind of, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30853102834 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6258418734 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459224372361 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193048124609 0.0996497079465 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.207761062522 0.0662205650399 314% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327417518199 0.162205337803 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.31660990909 0.0443174109184 714% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.