Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends
The reading article state that alturstic atc exists amoung human and animals. It is proved that with 2 example. However, the lecture disagree with these definition and give opposite example which is given in reading article.
Firstly, according to the reading metariel human can act in unselfish behavior with other people. And it illustrates that with donation organs for strange people and share their food with them, but the lecture believe that people can not think others and they usually act in selfish way. The professor gives example that people can donation their example but it is only related with strange society which is mean that people know always is appluased by other strange people. In this reason despite people could share thier foods with other and donated thier organs with others, these acts can not provide people are unselfish to the professor.
Secondly, the reading article gives that an animal example. This example shows that involved meerkats behaviour when they are hunting. When Meerkats are eating the one of them observers a predict to other, this means a meerkat does not eat while other had full of stomach. This meerkat if there is a dangerous station for other meerkats, it will give signal for others. However, according to the lecture it is not true example fot unselfish acting beacuse if there is a dangerous circumstance a meerkat is espace which is has responsible to give signal for other. Besides other meerkats never stay to after the they has full of stomach. And they never care of a meerkat which is not eat a meat for observation purpose.
In the conlusion, even the reading article defend that animal and human are unselfish avaliables. The lecture provide that it is not true with two examples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this definition' or 'these definitions'?
Suggestion: this definition; these definitions
...ple. However, the lecture disagree with these definition and give opposite example which is give...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'meerkats'' or 'meerkat's'?
Suggestion: meerkats'; meerkat's
...ample. This example shows that involved meerkats behaviour when they are hunting. When M...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ts are eating the one of them observers a predict to other, this means a meerkat does not...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...ides other meerkats never stay to after the they has full of stomach. And they never car...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...r meerkats never stay to after the they has full of stomach. And they never care of...
^^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...ey never care of a meerkat which is not eat a meat for observation purpose. In th...
^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'meat'.
Suggestion: meat
...ever care of a meerkat which is not eat a meat for observation purpose. In the conlu...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...n are unselfish avaliables. The lecture provide that it is not true with two examples.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95578231293 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34866593255 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465986394558 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6115772149 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0625 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0278449889457 0.272083759551 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00859808523228 0.0996497079465 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227495093862 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0127314349069 0.162205337803 8% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220514921119 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.