Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the people whom collecting the fossil and buying it to wealthy people. Writer feels this is wrong behavior for three reasons. The professor challenges the claims made by the author. She is out of the opinion that he is exaggorated.
To begin with, the writer argues that these fossils should be in the museums. In the articl he mentions that this attituade lead to decrease the number of puplic toward it. This specific arguments challenged by the speaker. She mention that its already increases the expoure to this valuable fossils. She provide an example of the school and universities student whom developed this strong interset.
Secondly, the writer sughest that there is lack of access to the scintists to achieve maxiumum information from it. The professor, however, rebuts this by bringing up that those people are established and found a lot of details about the fossils and how they test and they knew how to deal with it.
Finally, in the passage it is stated that fossils are eventually get damage due to improper handling from the collector. In contrast, the professor mentions that can not be happen. Moreover, she point out the these fossils has an exeprt scintist in this field. therefore, the chances to cause harm to them are less.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the opinion that he is exaggorated. To begin with, the writer argues that th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...rguments challenged by the speaker. She mention that its already increases the expoure ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...e expoure to this valuable fossils. She provide an example of the school and universiti...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whom developed this strong interset. Secondly, the writer sughest that there ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st and they knew how to deal with it. Finally, in the passage it is stated tha...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...t is stated that fossils are eventually get damage due to improper handling from th...
^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'points'.
Suggestion: points
...s that can not be happen. Moreover, she point out the these fossils has an exeprt sc...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., she point out the these fossils has an exeprt scintist in this field. therefore...
^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... has an exeprt scintist in this field. therefore, the chances to cause harm to them are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89090909091 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49718850174 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586363636364 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3618752645 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.7333333333 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122198227612 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354645942507 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382084473502 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706091154096 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245854573976 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.