Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
The development of the societies directly involved in the people whom live in it. The questions are the young members do their role into it?. I personally, believe that teenagers are not connected to their tasks toward their communities for several reasons.
One of the main important causes of why this negative behavior present is internet. While the web has a great benefits' to us, on the other hand, it is also may convince our children that working to help others is unbeneficial. For example, when a youth people start to browse on their phones and follow people whom spreading the hate and encourage the teenager to not been helpful to their society in cleaning the road, or cutting the excess trees in their areas. As result, the role of an effective help is absent.
Another significant point is most of these children are spend their times on games. Instead of going with their parent to provide a hand to their city they prefer to stay steady in front of their screen. X box, For instance, contain alots of attractive games on it and the possibility that the child could leave it to obtain a communities help is far-reaching. Thus, the game devices plays a major role of distraction and tend to make the children unable to achieve their responsibility's toward their society.
In addition to the bad effect of internet and the electronic games is the lack of time. Some of youth have to study and work in order to success in their careers and they don't have the time to spent on serving. Me is a great example to this dilemma. When I was 15 years old I had to work as part-time job after the school, after i finish my work I used to study and sleep. Eventually, I could not perform in my home town any kind of service due to lack of time.
In conclusion, the communities represent our cultural sites. While some of the members are having an effective method address its issues, some of them like a young people are not aware of it. I agree with the latter.
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 66
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 61
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their communities for several reasons. One of the main important causes of why ...
^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ant point is most of these children are spend their times on games. Instead of going ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...er to success in their careers and they dont have the time to spent on serving. Me i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s part-time job after the school, after i finish my work I used to study and slee...
^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ies represent our cultural sites. While some of the members are having an effective method ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54775280899 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52344610952 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4529643127 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2105263158 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7368421053 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307731481404 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792165851338 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058840700939 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160710553561 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586979847554 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.