Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
In this case of material, the text and the lecture offers two opposing views on the possibility of whether decline in book reading has unfortunate effects for the culture in general or not. With this in mind, the author casts doubt on devastating effects of decrease in reading literature books on culture. The lecture on the other hand, categorically, refutes all these episodes of argument mentioned in the reading , believing that those specific claims can be challenged.
First, the passage claims that decreased book reading has led to sharp decline in literature and missing out on important benefits that it can provide for us. In contrast, the speaker counteracts this idea, mentioning that reading other types of books, such as politic or etc instead of literature books can provide us plenty of benefits. Other categories of books can similarly stimulate our imagination and have any other benefit that literature books can bring about for us.
Moreover, this reading asserts that less reading and pay much attention to other types of entertainment material has lowered the level of culture. The lecture challenges this view point stating that, other types of entertainment can be valuable cultural material and these are not just books that can reach to the high standards of culture. In fact, listening to master pieces of music or other types of culture is not waste of time.
Finally, the author holds the view that because of the poor standards of today's readers, writing is going to decline as reading has done. On the other hand, the professor repudiates this opinion and believes that although less reading will lead to less support for writing, but its not always the reader's blame. Take it as example, modern art literature is one if the most difficult literature that can not attract readers and as result of that, less readers are interested in reading such hard pieces of arts and will spend time on other attractive materials.
- Voynich manuscript 83
- whether traveling to local cities is fruitful or to foreign countries 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 83
- frog population decline 80
- The reading and the lecture are both about the value of television appearances by university professors The author of the reading argues that they are very worthwhile for academics and their universities The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the 68
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...des of argument mentioned in the reading , believing that those specific claims ca...
^^
Line 7, column 447, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun readers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... attract readers and as result of that, less readers are interested in reading such ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, similarly, so, in contrast, in fact, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0462962963 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60058436765 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506172839506 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7348536707 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113544399904 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486111297599 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368901330864 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765210993349 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459060285523 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...des of argument mentioned in the reading , believing that those specific claims ca...
^^
Line 7, column 447, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun readers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... attract readers and as result of that, less readers are interested in reading such ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, similarly, so, in contrast, in fact, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0462962963 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60058436765 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506172839506 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7348536707 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113544399904 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486111297599 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368901330864 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765210993349 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459060285523 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.