Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and the lecture offer two opposing views on problems that archaeologists are confronted in Britain. Whereas the author of the reading claims that the arcaeologists have many difficulties in Britain, the lecturer believes that after guidlines adopted in Britain, circumstances have turned better. She casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First, according to the text, the increasing constructions in Britain has threatened the archaeological artifacts. However, the lecturer argues that regarding to the new rules, each costruction site, before begining the digging and constructing process, must examine by scientists. In that case, if any important fact is found, they would preserve the site for arcaeological procedures.
Secondly, although the reading discusses the insufficient amount of financial support for arcaeological projects, the lecturer states that based on the guidline, instead of government, construction companies are responsible for founds. Therefore, arcaeologists are not concerned about the financial maintainings anymore.
Finally, the text alleges that arcaeology jobs and paied projects are lessened in Britain, nevertheless, the lecturer suggests that many paid careers have been increased after the new rules, because before any construction, arcaeologists are needed to examin the site, do the scientific invetigations and preserve the available artifacts and it means that there are lots of job opportunities for arcaeologists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture offer two op...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he reading by providing three reasons. First, according to the text, the increa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the site for arcaeological procedures. Secondly, although the reading discusses...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut the financial maintainings anymore. Finally, the text alleges that arcaeolog...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95412844037 5.08290768461 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27544778651 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628440366972 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 99.1550724626 49.2860985944 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.222222222 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141203665828 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630318185987 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798242416459 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768308835341 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685646388927 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.3589403974 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.8541721854 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 12.2367328918 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.42419426049 123% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.