Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture offer two opposing views on accuracy of a historical evidence. Whereas the author of the reading suggests that the coin found was not the genuine proof for representing a historical evidence, the lecturer states that it could be one of the Norse's possessions. She challenges the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First, according to the text, the Norse settelments were very far from Native American site which proofs the impossibility of the fact that Norse possessing the coin. However, the lecturer believes that because Native American had traveled to Canad, the Norese settelments, they could bring back som objects such as the coin with them. She says that other objects in addition to the coin were found in the sit.
Secondly, the reading claims that no other coins were discovered in the site, which indicates that the coin was a fack evidence. Nevertheless, the lecturer disputes that Norse people had traveled to Europ and they might pakced all their silver coins for bringing back to Europ. She explains that finding no other coins, not necessary shows that the coins was not the real hisorical one.
Finally, the author asserts that Norse people knew that their silver coins were not valuable for American residents and they did not have any of them. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that due to the attarctive appearance of silver coins, American could have alure to possess them. Therfore, Nore peopel had used their silver coins for trading with American. American residents might know about the worthwhile silver necklesses, for example.
To recap, the lecturer casts doubt on the three points mentioned in the text about the precion of the historical coin found in the Native American site.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s in addition to the coin were found in the sit. Secondly, the reading claims that no ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for example, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03401360544 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44113444866 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493197278912 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8749958987 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121848546426 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521473576961 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547249086389 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809068378722 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637915552226 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.