Summarize the points made in the lecture.
Both the passage and the lecture deals with the question whether if we should colonize Mars or Titan as a second home for humanity. The lecturer discusses the points made in the passage but reaches a different conclusion in each case. According to him, it would be much easier to colonize Mars because of several reasons.
First, he mentions the atmospheric pressure and resources that are currently present on Titan. The passage suggests that the atmospheric pressure of Titan is similar to Earth and it plays a crucial role in why we should go to there. He opposes the idea since people will still need to wear space suit in both atmospheres, no matter Titan or Mars. Additionally, even though Titan has more methane and minerals, the lecturer says that water is the indispensable element that we need to seek for and water resources on Mars are abundant.
Secondly, the passage claims that the lower gravitation level on Titan will allow them to land easily and it will reduce the fuel which is spent to landing process. The lecturer contradicts this idea because having more gravitational force is better for our health. Otherwise, it causes a lot of problems about our bones.
Finally, he opposes the idea that the distance is unimportant as we do not need a lot of rocket fuel while we travel in vacuum. He says that the greater distance will take longer time and it will cause problems for the logistic of the colonization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
... the passage and the lecture deals with the question whether if we should colonize Mars or Titan as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun rocket seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of rockets'.
Suggestion: a lot of rockets
...stance is unimportant as we do not need a lot of rocket fuel while we travel in vacuum. He says...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79032258065 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60387728187 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560483870968 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7466047675 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105021351197 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442729883001 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903396837463 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663764899859 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766826947915 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.