summarize the points made in the lecture about solutions to frog population decline, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about frog population decline.
The reading states that frog species have a lot of benefit for human and these animals should be preserved from extinction and provides three solution for saving them. However, the listening cast doubt on those author's statement and says that one of them ways that offered is not practical and suggests three reasons fo support.
third, the passage asserts that pesticides that farmers use in order to prevent insects from damaging farm crops are major cause of harming to frogs. In contrast, the professor refutes this point by stating that it is not economical practical be eliminated to use of pesticides and it is unfair. In addition, there are serious competition between companies to acquire more products. she also mentions that if severe laws be enacted by government, the quantities of products and corn will be decreased significantly.
Second, the author explains that fungus that has spread all over the world with deadly effect are a major element in declining frog population. Notwithstanding, the professor contends this point stating that there is serious problem for solving this factor. she states that it is very hard to catch and treat all frog throughout the world. also, treating new generation and go on generation is very complex and very expensive.
third, the reading declares that changing in natural habitant of frog cause their population to reduce simply. Nevertheless, the lecture rejects this point by explaining that global warming are major factor that cause frog population decline. this event led water and marsh and lake to disappear that cause not only frog population but also extinctions other animals. she also says that the best way for maintaining frog population is that be prevented human to build home near their habitant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...suggests three reasons fo support. third, the passage asserts that pesticides th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat pesticides that farmers use in order to prevent insects from damaging farm cr...
^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...een companies to acquire more products. she also mentions that if severe laws be en...
^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...erious problem for solving this factor. she states that it is very hard to catch an...
^^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...nd treat all frog throughout the world. also, treating new generation and go on gene...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...s very complex and very expensive. third, the reading declares that changing in ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...tor that cause frog population decline. this event led water and marsh and lake to d...
^^^^
Line 13, column 369, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ion but also extinctions other animals. she also says that the best way for maintai...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21602787456 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65643283082 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4174687103 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232506245602 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763051742035 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726698464132 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126449322364 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863151683169 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.