Summarize points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points expressed in the reading.
The lecturer refutes the claims made in the reading passage regarding privatized spaceflight. He expresses the following reasons for his disagreement with the reading passage.
The passage contends that privatized spaceflight will benefit space exploration with less cost involvement. On the contrary, the lecturer highlights two major points which will add to the cost i.e. space control systems which are to be installed to check and avoid a collision, also various safety tests for these spacecraft would be required before their commercialization. This will only add to the expenditure and will always be a necessity whenever a new privatized spacecraft is required. Therefore, prices in spaceflight will always be high to cover up the cost used during the initial phase.
The reading claims that privatization will accelerate the rate at which important scientific discoveries occur. Conversely, the lecturer states that there will be a delay in discoveries and scientific innovations because best engineers would be working on more commercial stuff. This would lead to a serious problem wherein scientific innovations and discoveries at the important organization would hold no interest.
Finally, the reading claims that the financial burden of the taxpayer would be reduced with this privatization. However, the lecturer disagrees with this by stating that privatization spaceflight technology will have huge public tax subsidy. They won't be able to raise huge money out of it instead will have to pay more to subsidize.
In conclusion, the points made in the reading regarding the benefits of privatizing spaceflight are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62204724409 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14142638576 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7246712632 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107578353175 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422964625482 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383592485301 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702257764823 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033571119894 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.