Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Career selection is one of the essential parts of an individual's life. It shapes the future and brings sustainability in one's life. However, in my opinion, in the past, it was not easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
In the past, parents were not much updated as compared to parent now. They used to read job posting via newspaper/ or some article and would ask their kids to prepare accordingly for the same. Whereas nowadays parents are more educated and tech-friendly. They come to know about various jobs through online job portals, via friends in various organizations, many take help from various career counselors to help identify the best possible career for a secured future. Previously, the job careers were also limited and education was not that vast. People choose their career fields based on the amount of income they will fetch from a particular job. They preferred doing a one-year diploma or just pass higher secondary exams to get jobs based on that. This was again a pressure area, since based on the type of degree it was difficult to get a proper authenticated job in the same career field, rather most landed up doing some temporary jobs to earn a healthy living for that particular time. It was not easy to identify a career or job which was secure rather one would just land up doing one work or the other to earn a proper means for living a life. The job was there but not in a desired direction and satisfaction.
Technology has advanced a lot now, as compared to earlier days. One can sit in front of his/her computer/laptop and submit a resume online to fetch a job. Moreover, most of the interview rounds are conducted via telephone/mobile whereas in earlier days people used to go in person to most of the places for their interviews. They used to wait long hours for their turn since the number of candidates was more. This was time-consuming as well as draining for people as many would face interviews by late evenings.
The career options available today are varied and the parents are more friendly towards the career selection. They don't pressurize much on securing a government job which was a trend in the past. Rather, they support their children in varied fields of career selection like one can become a singer, dancer, pilot, environmentalist, agriculturalist, media reporter, statistician, food engineer etc. Cost of education was also one of the factors that most of the people were not able to select a career of their choice and would land up doing petty jobs which bring no satisfaction, hence less future security.
Therefore, in earlier days it was not easy to identify a secured job for a successful future since the peers were not updated much which in turn put a lot of pressure on people to identify best career choices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ion is one of the essential part of any individuals life. It shapes the future and brings s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...the future and brings sustainability in ones life. However, in my opinion in the pas...
^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'identify the best'.
Suggestion: identify the best
... from various career counselors to help identify best possible career for secured future. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st possible career for secured future. Previously, the job careers were also li...
^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...friendly towards career selection. They dont pressurize much on securing a governmen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79793814433 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63322799069 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486597938144 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1007061003 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.173913043 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0869565217 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252794179118 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810917659444 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930095899693 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151695822605 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741184074078 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.