Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and the lecture offer two opposing views on asteroids as an alternative colonization. Whereas the author of the reading suggests that asteroids provide great opportunities for develop colony on them, the lecturer enumerates three reasons to reject this concept. He challenges the idea by explaining the three following facts.
First, according to the text, having low gravity in asteroids, easier landing and taking off could be provided for spacecrafts. In this case, crafts could carry more necessary objects for astronauts, and their easier take off allows them to use their remained fuel back to Earth. However, the lecturer disputes that low gravity has many negative effects on astronauts' health such as reducing bone density and loosing muscle’s mass, which hurt colonists’ body.
Secondly, the author claims that asteroids have many cherished minerals which is lucrative to mining, finding, and transferring to Earth. Although, the lecturer believes that supporting the colony and transferring the precious minerals to Earth have noticeable expenses, which will lessen the worth of fulfilling this idea. Moreover, he asserts that in case of mining lots of minerals, their prices in the market would decline. This disadvantage will decrease the mission’s profit.
Finally, the reading mentions that the asteroids are orbiting near Earth, and reaching and returning from them would take lower time than other planets, but the lecturer implies that the asteroids’ orbit pattern is erratical. He explains that it would be possible to reach them easily, but they change their path regularly, which makes the returning procedure more challenging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture offer two op...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... explaining the three following facts. First, according to the text, having low...
^^^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'astronauts'' or 'astronaut's'?
Suggestion: astronauts'; astronaut's
...ow gravity has many negative effects on astronauts health such as reducing bone density an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le’s mass, which hurt colonists’ body. Secondly, the author claims that asteroi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge will decrease the mission’s profit. Finally, the reading mentions that the a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56470588235 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72207149109 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.500561164 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0952440060785 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373989715715 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342722080814 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061515451417 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042125422025 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.