Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are discussing the possibility of colonization to an asteroid. the reading supports the reason that is the best idea and the lecture claims the contrary that down site is not good practice.
First, the reading explains that asteroids are smaller and they have lower gravity making the landing safer than landing on the mars or moon. On another hand, the lecture argues that low gravity present risk and living there for a few months will cause serious problems on health such damage on muscle, bones etc.
Second, reading stays that an asteroid colony would be extremely profitable because of the raw materials such as gold and platinum. The lecture casts in doubt that is not such a profitable idea because there are a lot of costs and the price of these materials will not be the same in the future. Definitely is not such a profitable idea.
Finally, the reading support evidence that an asteroid is easy to reach and get closer to Earth than our moon. The lecture explains that orbits are unusually and making the return more and more dangers and very long. Also, it is more challenging than going to a planet like Mars.
In conclusion, the evidence given in the reading in favor of best colonization to an asteroid
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ibility of colonization to an asteroid. the reading supports the reason that is the...
^^^
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...health such damage on muscle, bones etc. Second, reading stays that an asteroid c...
^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
... evidence given in the reading in favor of best colonization to an asteroid
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, second, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75115207373 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41566099405 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52534562212 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2695960714 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7272727273 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0933308414199 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372872554443 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239288164048 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510621899302 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00631047497735 0.0443174109184 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.