Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage.
The main topic of both the passage and the lecture is solutions to decrease the danger of glasses for birds because birds can't distinguish between the glass and open air. The passage suggests three solutions to prevent birds' injury. The professor, on the other hand, categorically denies whatever mentioned in the reading by citing several reasons.
First, The passage goes on to mention that replacing usual glasses with one-way glasses is a beneficial solution. When birds see this kind of glass, they will imagine that a barrier is in front of them and change their direction. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects this author's solution and illustrates the idea that one-way glasses work as a mirror and reflect the pictures of sky or trees. Thus, this reflection deceives birds and lets them fly through the glass.
Second of all, according to the reading, painting glasses with colorful lines is another solution that can help birds to understand the distinction between the window and open air. Also, people are still able to see via the opening space between lines. Nonetheless, the speaker refutes the reading solution, saying that birds treat with a colorless piece of these glasses as a hole and fly into them. To prevent them from this action, the professor believes that we must design spaces between lines extremely short. As a consequence, the building becomes very dark. Therefore, the lecturer says that it's not a practical solution.
Eventually, the article states that magnetic fields could be efficient because birds have an intrinsic capability to navigate easily and receive signals from Earth; however, the professor mentions that this solution is not beneficial either. He proves his idea by claiming that birds use this ability just in long-distance navigation, and for short trips, they benefit their eyes. For example, when they migrate from cold areas to warm sites, they use this ability to sense magnetic fields, but in short trips and flying from one apartment to another, they use their vision.
To sum up, both the author and the speaker address solutions for the harmful effects of glasses on birds. The passage argues three reasons to prevent birds from flying into windows directly. In contrast, the professor points out that these solutions are not practical and have major problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nger of glasses for birds because birds cant distinguish between the glass and open ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hree solutions to prevent birds injury. The professor, on the other hand, categoric...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in contrast, in short, kind of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1373.03311258 142% => OK
No of words: 377.0 270.72406181 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18037135279 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50030639301 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 145.348785872 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549071618037 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8804665358 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.789473684 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94736842105 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118718182423 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399146287869 0.0996497079465 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296155274294 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07513103199 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311053110404 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.