Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the Pre Raphaelite brotherhood which was criticized by critics. The author of the reading states that Pre Raphaelite was attracted by medieval culture which was referred as archaic in art at the time. Yet, the brotherhood mentioned it was begun to lost over the time as the medieval culture clashed with the principle of realism. In addition, realism was concerned with the observation of nature and Pre Raphaelite was a keen observer and concentrates closely on nature.
The writing states that Pre Raphaelite was influenced by Ruskin. Similarly, he held the belief that painter must be real to nature. Additionally, he points out that artist must rendered what was observed and understood imaginatively on canvas. Likewise, the lecture elaborates this by mentioning that Ruskin was fascinated towards the Pre Raphaelite study of landscape and his strong determination on accuracy of plant and it’s minute details. Moreover, later Pre Raphaelite brotherhood admired the foundation of art school.
Finally, the brotherhood strongly dissolved and transferred to distinct things. However, they stayed close friends. Furthermore, the founding members collaborated for the renewal of brotherhood under the guidance of Dante who held the Pre Raphaelite precepts. Eventually, they expanded the Pre Raphaelite torch which was also mentioned on one of the book called “ The escape boat”
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds similar concept on Pre Raphaelite brotherhood. Both of them are susceptible to support each other’s idea.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al culture which was referred as archaic in art at the time. Yet, the brotherhood...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4612244898 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97746639317 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579591836735 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2955123947 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.057166023611 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236125021986 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265514856848 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0369593268442 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104702850112 0.0443174109184 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al culture which was referred as archaic in art at the time. Yet, the brotherhood...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4612244898 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97746639317 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579591836735 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2955123947 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.057166023611 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236125021986 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265514856848 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0369593268442 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104702850112 0.0443174109184 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.