Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
Both the passage and the lecture are about the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, a brotherhood founded by three renowned artists William Holman Hunt, John Everett Millais and Dante Gabriel Rossetti. According to the lecture, the Pre-Raphaelites dealt with the medieval culture that was considered to be archaic at that time, but they believed that there were spiritual and artistic elements instilled in medieval culture that they felt were lost and they had to preserve them. Medieval culture was considered archaic because it clashed with realism, which held the importance of independent observation of nature. But the Pre-Raphaelites were keen observers of nature and were strict in getting details of plants and minute parts accurately.
Much of the reason why they were keen observers was due to the influence by John Ruskin. This was because Ruskin believed that a painter should be true to nature and that an artist's job was to observe the reality of nature and render it as seen and understood, imaginatively on canvas. This corroborates the point in the lecture where it is stated that Ruskin admired the innovations in landscape paintings by these artists and their dedication to accuracy in rendering plants and fine details.
Finally, while the professor in the lecture indicates that the Brotherhood dissolved in the early 1850s, the passage indicates that there was a revival that took place in 1855 in which Gabriel Dante Rossetti, who was a member of the Brotherhood, met Burne-Jones and Morris. Rossetti took these two under his wing and taught them. Together they continued the Pre-Raphaelite tradition.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, still, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2984496124 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88916767017 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.7190452849 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.7 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0916286811517 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353703549021 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286385296909 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613302134024 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00949129128186 0.0443174109184 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.