Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
frog's population which have declined in recent years
The reading and lecture are both about the frog's population which have declined in recent years. The author of reading believes some solutions may help this situation. The lecture challenged the statements made by the author. Professor is of the opinion that these solutions are not suitable for this condition.
First of all, the author suggests that pesticides have harmful effects for frogs, so should approve rules for farmers that they cannot use these chemicals substances. This idea is challenged by the professor. She says that this solution is not practical, because it has disadvantages for farmers in markets. Furthermore, he argues that if a farmer cannot use pesticides, who probably will lose their crops, consequently, he have a lower yield at the end of the year. As a result, a farmer fails in competition with other farmers.
Secondly, the writer contends that fungus has a detrimental effect on the skin of the frog. The article notes can use the antifungal medication and the specific treatment which it is able to remove the infection of fungus. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that the treatment has a huge problem for using on a large scale. She elaborates on this be mentioning that utilizing this care should capture all frogs otherwise this work is impossible, therefore applying this way is not perfect.
Finally, it is stated that natural habitats of frogs are threatened by human activities. The author establishes that excessive water use and draining of wetlands make problems for frogs. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that human activities are not a critical threat actually, global warming is a real problem. The professor mentions that in recent years, global warming has affected wetland habitats and water. So, stopping human movements is unlikely to solve the problems caused by global warming
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
... reading and lecture are both about the frogs population which have declined in recen...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...some solutions may help this situation. The lecture challenged the statements made ...
^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...will lose their crops, consequently, he have a lower yield at the end of the year. A...
^^^^
Line 13, column 319, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ally, global warming is a real problem. The professor mentions that in recent years...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19867549669 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71734895652 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0796712261 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2222222222 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127899561122 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040401637976 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624863248572 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802486051923 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514954369123 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.