Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading claims that there are three theories that prove the basic of the Voynich manuscript that no one has realized that book until now. However, the lecturer finds all ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
the author argues that the manuscript is an especial work consist of some unknown codes that is similar to a herbal that its origin is for 1550.Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that in the the book that was written by Ascham there are not any original ideas for example in the herbal there are common plants base on other well-known sources so this is impossible for this writer to offer some thing like this.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that the manuscript is fake and there is no real magical powers in that and the purpose of creating this book was just for selling it to a wealthy noble. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that Edward Kelley was not a honest man and deceived people but there is not any good reason for the writer to create the manuscript to sell it to rich people because the people of sixteen century tended to simple texts and there was no necessary for writer to write a complex work like this as a fake book.
Finally, the reading asserts that the manuscript is a modern fictitious to be an antique book an earn a lot of money from that. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that the material that has used for the manuscript such as volume pages and ink pages are for 400 years old and it is not reasonable that Voynich has made the manuscript as a fake book because he could not find any ink from 400 years old so it can be conclude that the manuscript had been created before Voynich obtain it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nts some evidence to refute them all. the author argues that the manuscript is an...
^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Conversely
...to a herbal that its origin is for 1550.Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...the lecturer brings up the idea that in the the book that was written by Ascham there a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...the lecturer brings up the idea that in the the book that was written by Ascham there a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 400, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
... is impossible for this writer to offer some thing like this. Furthermore, the reading pa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nes the fact that Edward Kelley was not a honest man and deceived people but ther...
^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...ch people because the people of sixteen century tended to simple texts and there was no...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...modern fictitious to be an antique book an earn a lot of money from that. In contrast, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, so, well, as for, for example, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47634069401 5.08290768461 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3203088278 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495268138801 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 21.2450331126 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.936911857 49.2860985944 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 202.714285714 110.228320801 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 45.2857142857 21.698381199 209% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.5714285714 7.06452816374 235% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0402603175825 0.272083759551 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0230681132759 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220490540287 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0248447415183 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244163463134 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 13.3589403974 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.0289183223 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.498013245 191% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.2008830022 179% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.